Dead Man's Vitamin

& the docs who prescribe them

  • ABOUT

THE HISTORY OF ECT

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on April 3, 2018
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: child psychiatry, ect, electroconvulsive therapy, mental health, mental health services, psychiatrist, Psychiatry. 5 Comments

ECT was first developed by Ugo Cerletti in 1938, in Italy.   After attending medical schools at Rome and Turin, he went on to tour European “sanctuaries” including those run by the infamous Emil Kraepelin and Franz Nissl. 

Cerletti applied the skills he learned in medical school to design a white winter camouflage suit after which he was naturally made Head of the Neurobiological Institute in Milan.  What better place for a fashionista?

Cerletti turned his attention to the matter of epilepsy because, according him:  “I have always given prime importance to the study of epilepsy, since it is linked to many areas of neurology and psychiatry”.  In the course of his study of this disease, he tried to replicate an epileptic state in dogs by passing a 125-volt current through their bodies – he must have been out sick the day they covered the “first do no harm” bit.  He killed a lot dogs.

After he’d finished stacking up the dog corpses, he decided to move on to humans.  In his words:  “The daily confrontation with the dogs who had been made epileptic by electroshock treatment naturally gave me the idea of a possible similar application on man”.    Naturally.

“One day I heard that at the Rome slaughterhouse they were killing pigs with the electric current used for lighting” so he went to the slaughterhouse to check it out.  Sure enough, “I saw some butchers moving about among the pigs, holding in both hands a large pair of pincers, which had at both ends two discs, spiked with small, blunted, metallic tips.  When they got near to the animals, they opened the jaws of the pincers and quickly grasped the front part of the pig’s head between the tips of the discs where 70-80 volts were sent through the electric cable.  As soon as the animals had been got hold of, they fell rigid to the ground without even uttering a sound and shortly after, began to present general clonic shocks.”  (Clonic shocks are seizures).    

You could see how that might appeal to a psychiatrist. 

Cerletti walked off from the slaughterhouse with a set of those electric pincers in hand, a happy man, off to kill more dogs.

Cerletti’s first human victim was a man that the police had apprehended who was “behaving in a very odd way, answering questions put to him in a very strange language which was completely incomprehensible”.  The poor guy was probably speaking a different language that nobody at the psychiatric institute could speak.  And from that, they diagnosed him as schizophrenic. 

Note – schizophrenia is defined as “a mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behaviour, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation.

Sounds a lot like most psychiatrists.

This poor sod was Cerletti’s “first experiment” [Cerletti’s words] in electroshock.   He secured two electrodes soaked in a saline solution to this man’s head with an elastic band and send 80 volts through his head.  After this treatment,  the patient begged “Not another one!  You will kill me.” 

Cerletti’s response was to administer another shock to the patient, at a higher voltage, and damn near kill him.  Cerletti noted that after the second shock “treatment”, “there was an interruption in breathing and a deathlike cyanosis (blueish tinge) of the face which, if upsetting in a spontaneous epileptic fit, seemed to us in this case distressingly unending”.

Cerletti then went on to administer 19 more shocks until he was in “complete remission” which, in psych-speak, means that he was quiet and compliant.

And that was the start of electroshock therapy. 

Contemporary proponents of it will tell you that it is “safe and effective”.   Psychiatrists now use heavy sedation and anesthetic before shocking their victims, but this does not make the procedure less harmful.  Sedation and anesthetic dull the agony the victim feels, but they don’t do a damned thing to lessen the damage. It is a very poor trade-off — potentially irreversible brain damage and mental dysfunction in exchange for the docility and temporary emotional blunting or euphoria that result from the damage.

Ernest Hemingway, after receiving some 20 rounds of ECT said “It was a brilliant cure, but we lost the patient”.  Having lost many of his memories as a result, took a shotgun to his head not long after.

It’s more like the psychiatric version of a date-rape drug that leaves the victim helpless and forgetful of the violation. 

ECT is not treatment.  It’s terrorism.  It’s time to put a stop to it.

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

THE DEAD DON’T LIE

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on December 5, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

Reposted from Leonie Fennell’s Blog  – An Irish gal whose courage and relentless pursuit of justice for the people who have been harmed or lost their lives due to psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry.  Someone I admire very much.

A report published this month by ScotSID (Scottish Suicide Information Database) makes for very interesting reading. It specifically looked at deaths by suicide in Scotland between 2009-2015, the deceaseds’ contact with mental health services and more importantly, the psychiatric drugs that were prescribed to them beforehand.

Interestingly, I remember (after Shane’s death) trying to find similar information in Ireland, only to be told ah sure, we couldn’t ask families such personal information. It just wouldn’t be right – and sure if the drugs were dangerous, no-one would prescribe them. You think? I’ll park the aul sarcasm there for now.

Continue reading at Leonie’s Blog…

SaveSave

SaveSave

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

PSYCHIATRY: INDUSTRY OF DEATH EXHIBIT – COMING TO TORONTO

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on September 6, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

And it couldn’t be coming at a more opportune moment!

Countless stories in the international media lately about the over-prescribing of psychotropic drugs, more and more being prescribed to children under 5 years old.

Pharmaceutical Companies bombarded by lawsuits from people whose lives have  been so injuriously affected – Psychiatry: Industry of Death is a must see for anyone interested in the field of mental health and human rights.

This Exhibit provides practical guidance for lawmakers, doctors, human rights advocates and private citizens to take action in their own sphere to bring psychiatry under the law.

-EXHIBIT-EMAIL-2017

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

PSYCHIATRY & ONE BRAVE MAN

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on June 20, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: mental health industry, paxil, psychiatrist, Psychiatry, seroxat, xanax. 3 Comments

I recently came upon Michael Priebe’s blog where he tells his story of withdrawal from Paxil and Xanax.   The sheer hell he experienced while doing so and his precise accounting of the complete lack of consideration shown him by psychiatrists.  He really hits the mark on that.

His story is told in 3 parts, but I will put it up in its entirety.  Here is a link to his site if anyone wanted to get into communication with him.
https://www.michaelpriebewriter.com

MORE THAN A GLIMPSE OF HELL (Part 1)

October 25, 2016

The bed was soaked yet again, the sheets saturated with a pungent, urgent sweat caused by nightmares and the prescription toxins that were trying to leave my body. Once again the few restless moments of sleep I was able to “enjoy” were interrupted by the nightly ritual of my wife turning on the lights and stripping the bed so that we could lie on a surface that didn’t feel as if Patrick Ewing had just used it as his postgame massage table.

It was still dark outside—predawn hours—but I had to be up for work shortly. I lived just outside of Milwaukee in Waukesha, WI, but I commuted to my post at Madison (technical) College each day, a trip that took an hour and fifteen minutes one way in good traffic that didn’t include getting stalled by the notoriously long freight trains that passed through Waukesha.

I worked in the Testing Center at Madison College, a position that had me dealing not only with large numbers of students most days but also with the daily ups and downs of office interaction with coworkers.

I couldn’t believe I was still functioning at my job. How did people not know about my illness? When would they find out? How would they find out? How long until I had some sort of public breakdown that ended the whole charade?

Or maybe everyone already knew and was too polite to say anything. I mean, how could they miss the rapid weight loss and the sudden and persistent appearance of midnight-black bags under my eyes? I was sure I looked like a zombie, but maybe it was all in my head. I was getting trapped in my head a lot lately.

As my wife tidied up the bed and quietly cursed my relentless night sweats, I worried about the upcoming workday. How would I make the drive in my sleepless condition? How would I survive the office in my anxious condition? Even the tiniest hint of workplace stress might send my compromised system into a panic that exposed my “secret” illness. I wasn’t well-rested or well-nourished enough to survive the ups and downs that define a normal day for most people. I could barely eat or sleep and I hadn’t been able to do either of those things sufficiently for months, ever since making the decision to stop taking the Paxil that had been prescribed to me for anxiety attacks suffered as a 21-year-old college student.

I was now in my mid-thirties, and I was starting to suspect that prescription medicines were causing me anxiety and a host of other problems rather than fixing much of anything. It took me a long time to come to that suspicion, but as they say, Better late than never.

Paxil—one of the biggest rock stars among the SSRI super pills that flooded our society around the millennium—had been causing certain health issues for me, not just physical ones but emotional ones as well. I had little energy or tolerance for exercise, I dealt with stress by drinking and eating too much, I gained weight, I had elevated blood pressure, I had elevated liver enzyme levels, and I just kind of “floated” through many aspects of life, unable to fully engage with existence the way other people did.

As I found myself within striking distance of turning 40, I desperately wanted the sort of healthy, “normal” life that I suspected other people had, so I finally decided the Paxil had to go.

I thought that life would get better when I quit taking the Paxil—remove the problem and life gets better, I reasoned—but I was wrong. And not just a little bit wrong. Once the Paxil was removed from my life, all hell broke loose and I didn’t even see it coming.

And a short time later, when I began cutting out the Xanax that the family doctor had prescribed to go along with my Paxil, all hell broke loose again. And once again, I truly couldn’t have predicted the strange physical pains and extreme mental anguish that would pummel me and not let up for years.

You see, that’s the problem with antidepressant and benzodiazepine withdrawal—especially the drawn-out or ‘protracted” kind like I experienced: you don’t expect it because few people even acknowledge that it exists. Doctors will dismiss you, loved ones will have a hard time relating to you, and all across the world the gigantic pharmaceutical machine will continue to grind its profitable gears without so much as a hiccup. The lines at CVS and Walgreens never get shorter, and people are still willing to turn their emotions and brains over to the modern inventions of profit-driven chemistry.

If you tell someone in the medical establishment that you are sick because of a prescription medication or because you are trying to quit one, they will most likely tell you that it sounds as if you need a different prescription medication.

Withdrawal? What is that?

The clock signaled that it was almost time for me to leave for work. There would be no more sweating in bed wondering about what new withdrawal-related symptoms the day would bring, because it was time to experience it all firsthand again. I always hoped that one morning it would all be over, but like Groundhog Day, each morning seemed to bring more of the same.

I left the relative safety of my bed and made my way across the hall to the spare bedroom that housed the treadmill. The sun was about to rise, and I needed to get the anxiety out of my system somehow. This wouldn’t be the spiritually refreshing, five-mile morning jog of a healthy man on his way out to conquer the world. No, this would be the uncoordinated and breathless five-minute effort of a man who was hoping for a small hint of calm in the anxious storms that were becoming the norm in his life.

When my short session on the treadmill was finished, I showered, dressed for work, and resolved that I would try to survive another day in the strange and terrifying new reality that was my world since quitting Paxil.

I went into the bedroom and kissed my wife goodbye. Fear was visible in my eyes and pulsated from my fragile body language. I felt as if some demonic force (or even a strong wind) could send me through the earth’s crust and into hell at any moment.

“Pray for me,” I told my wife in a desperate voice, and then I went downstairs to get on with the commute.

MORE THAN A GLIMPSE OF HELL PART 2: UNFROZEN

November 15, 2016

I awoke to a heavy circle of pain pressing down over my heart. The day seemed pale and gloomy in a way that was out of line for even the most overcast of winter mornings in Wisconsin. My house was full of family—brothers, in-laws, and a new nephew—but I felt alone, and that strange feeling of isolation swirled around the day’s first moments like an ominous wind.

“Good morning,” my youngest brother said in a singsong voice as he lowered my baby nephew close to my face. Playing the role of good hosts, my wife and I had surrendered our bedroom and were sleeping on an air mattress on the floor of my office. I wanted to stay on that air mattress indefinitely. I didn’t want to be awake. A photographer was scheduled to come over later in the day for family pictures, and I couldn’t imagine how I would play the role of “normal human being” for that.

“Say hello to your Uncle Mike,” my brother said to his firstborn.

Baby Jackson: He was tiny and fresh, a physical manifestation of both life’s beauty and God’s genius. I responded to the sight of his cherubic little face by descending even further into my sludgy pit of depression.

The thick blanket of terror and despair that now suffocated me was unlike anything I could recall feeling before. As dull sunlight tried to creep through the blinds of my office windows—as my one-month-old nephew cooed and stared at his confused uncle—I somehow felt that death was upon me.

Life equals death: that was how my mind was working now.

I’d quit taking Paxil the month before, after almost a decade and a half of ingesting it for the “generalized anxiety” that had been diagnosed by a family doctor and a short self-assessment checklist. Ever since quitting, my life had gotten confusing and sinister in a way that seemed to speak of impending doom.

I was 35 years old, and I truly felt that my best days were behind me.

Looking back on those first months of Paxil withdrawal, I can now recognize that some characteristics of my emotions were bubbling to the surface after years of being suppressed in some way. After spending so much time under the depths of medication, the emotions were understandably waterlogged and confused, so their first attempts to speak came through as some inexplicable depression—the kind one experiences when looking at a precious newborn baby, of course.

During antidepressant withdrawal, a certain numbness slowly gives way to the tingles of normal emotional experience, but nothing feels normal for a long time. In fact, a few months after suffering that baby-induced episode of depression, my younger brother and his wife were visiting again when I was overcome by another confusing sensation, a pain really.

We were watching the movie Ted—that classic, raunchy comedy starring Mark Wahlberg and a stuffed bear—when I noticed something strange happening to my face. It hurt in a way I didn’t recognize.

I’d been having weird body pains ever since taking that last dose of Paxil, but this sort of facial discomfort was a new one. My cheeks ached in a sharp way, especially near the dimpled areas involved in smiling and laughing.

Then I realized, my face was hurting because I’d been smiling and laughing. It wasn’t used to being stretched by such spontaneous displays of joy anymore.

My face had been frozen in some painful mask of withdrawal-induced stoicism for months, but now it was becoming “unfrozen.”

Becoming unfrozen: that’s an apt way to describe the profound and painful thawing process that takes place as prescription medication fades from a person’s mind and body. There is so much blunted awareness that wants to come back to life, and there are so many repressed emotions that want to have a voice, but the person in withdrawal really isn’t ready for such a flood of activity. He or she really isn’t strong enough. The person who was taking medication was flying around the edges of life without truly feeling or noticing thoughts for a long time, and then BAM. The pills are gone, and the icebergs start to melt. It is overwhelming and confusing.

Tears flow for little or no reason—sobs can be sparked by the last few “teachable” minutes of a family sitcom or by the melodrama of a Lifetime movie, for example—and then there is the unprovoked depression, the twisted anxiety, and the legions of thoughts that race day and night.

Day and night the thoughts and emotions run wild and confused, and after several months of this, when all of those thoughts and emotions continue to gather en masse and dance and fornicate like some sleepless group of college students on ecstasy, a person starts to wonder if maybe he’s insane.

And that’s when beginning the prescription madness anew starts to seem like a reasonable idea. Maybe the old pills were necessary. Or maybe some new ones are needed.

I had wanted so badly to be free of the medication, but shortly after quitting Paxil, I began to wonder if maybe it wasn’t time to admit defeat. Maybe I simply had to accept that I was broken in a way that could only be fixed by the contents of little orange bottles. I thought that I’d been making progress—painful progress in small increments, but progress nonetheless—but maybe I’d just been kidding myself.

Maybe the doctors—the ones who had played no small role in creating my current lunacy—really did have the answers, and maybe those answers only existed as 21st-century pills. Despite my misgivings, maybe I needed to go see one of them again, at least to make sure that I wasn’t dying. What was the worst that could happen if I went back to the “experts” in white coats, or maybe even went back to the Paxil or something similar?

I was about to find out.

MORE THAN A GLIMPSE OF HELL (PART 3): THE DOCTORS

January 18, 2017

As the world around me enjoyed a pleasant Saturday afternoon, I sat on my bed trembling, wondering if I was dying or going insane. While other people sipped lattes at coffee shops and ran casual errands or watched movies or college football, I fought to keep a faint grip on some sense of normalcy and well-being. I was 35-years-old and I felt utterly alone, as if I were some unfortunate astronaut whose tether to the mothership had been tragically severed while he was performing exterior maintenance on the craft.

Whoosh. Away I flew into a vast, empty darkness. As I careened by the occasional burning star or foreign sun, I could still see, faintly, the people and the life that I’d left behind. However, like a ghost, I could no longer touch my loved ones or share with them a laugh or a bit of sunny enjoyment on a weekend. I could only wonder about my murky place in the universe and hurt.

Two months or so earlier, I’d quit taking the Paxil that had been prescribed to me in college for that nebulous, modern affliction known as Generalized Anxiety. Since taking my last dose of those pink pills, the world had become a ghoulish place indeed. The physical symptoms of the drug withdrawal were uncomfortable—the constant nausea, chronic insomnia, and damned fatigue were draining—but it was the mental and emotional troubles that were truly frightening.

I could no longer make sense of or enjoy a normal day because my system was a toxic stew of depression, guilt, and dread. And I was routinely getting “trapped” in my own head, sequestered in uncomfortably close quarters with a motley mix of intrusive and negative thoughts. I was alone in such a way even when surrounded by loved ones. I was constantly slipping further and further into that empty darkness, and there only seemed to be one solution: I needed to get back on the Paxil.

Despite all the hard work I’d done up to that point to quit the potent medication—and despite the physical and emotional side-effects that had compelled my decision to quit in the first place—I reluctantly ran backward, back toward the prescription bottle that I still kept in my office, ostensibly in case I needed to pursue an emergency reinstatement such as this.

I fished a little pill from the orange, plastic bottle that had become such a familiar sight over the years, and I swallowed the bitter pharmaceutical hopefully. However, almost immediately I knew there was a problem. My bedroom started spinning and shifting, and I felt a nausea so profoundly upsetting that it seemed as if I were receiving some divine punishment from above—a punishment for crawling back to the devil instead of seeking God in my hour of need.

Because my body had fought so valiantly to rid itself of paroxetine’s chemical intrusions—after my tired mind had perhaps seen some reprieve in the near future—the entirety of my being protested the medication’s sudden return. My systems began to kick and scream, yelling at me, What have you done? My world seemed to be crashing down quickly, so I did what any married man in his midthirties would do under such duress: I called my mom.

“Please, please don’t think less of me for taking the pill,” I cried into the phone. “If I really need this medication because I’m sick, then please don’t think less of me.” I’d said that I was going to stop the medication and get healthy, but now I wasn’t sure what healthy was. Was it quitting the pills or taking them? Was I now sick because I’d been duped into taking the pills, or had I really needed the pills all along because I was born sick, the woeful and unlucky recipient of a deficient serotonin or norepinephrine supply.

As my mother listened to me cry and ramble, I felt like a scared little child who just pretended to be a man at times. Maybe I would never accomplish anything in life, not even the basic goal of sorting out my own wellness.

“You know that your dad and I would never think less of you,” my mom reassured me as only a mother can. Her words made me feel a little less like a failure, but I still felt gut-wrenchingly sick from the pill I’d swallowed. I wondered when the effects of that pill would subside, and I wondered when my wife would be getting home.

Dr. Feelgood was tanned and confident. He had a nice haircut and a paunch that seemed to speak of nice restaurants. He smiled often through the adornment of his goatee, and he often tried to reassure me that we were buddies more than anything. He acted casual and cool by throwing me winks and even the thumb-and-index-finger gunshot on one occasion, and he always gave me more pills when I asked for them.

Now that I was trying to get off the pills, Dr. Feelgood didn’t seem to fully understand me anymore. Either that or he didn’t want to admit to playing any part in the gruesome scene I was now presenting to him. I was in pain, all the time, and I was looking for answers and reassurance.

“Well, any withdrawal effects from the Paxil should have been relatively minor,” Dr. Feelgood said, “and they should have been over after a week or two.”

I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. I’d been off the Paxil—with the exception of that one, ill-advised reinstatement dose—for about four months, and nothing felt close to being over. If my harrowing pains and mental fog weren’t withdrawal, then I was seriously ill with something that seemed willing and able to kill me.

“It sounds like your pains are mostly stress related,” Feelgood said. “We all channel stress in different ways. If you don’t want to take an SSRI antidepressant, then maybe you’d have some luck with Wellbutrin.”

During that first, confusing half year of withdrawal, I ended up trying Wellbutrin, a norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor that can apparently be prescribed for just about anything. I would later learn that the medication is marketed as both an antidepressant and as a smoking cessation aid (in addition to being used in an “off-label” manner for ADD and anxiety), and at Feelgood’s suggestion I took the multitalented pharmaceutical for about a week, until I could no longer stand how it filled me with useless adrenaline and agitation.

After the Wellbutrin, I almost tried other prescriptions, too. Every so often at work—when the withdrawal had me feeling as if I were about to lose my mind or go into cardiac arrest—I’d step outside and place a frantic phone call to Feelgood’s office. “Maybe Pill X or Pill Y will help,” I’d suggest to his nurse hopefully, but I never followed through on those suggestions, because the thought of eventually having to tackle yet another pill withdrawal was more than I could stomach. In addition to quitting the Paxil, I’d begun a tapering schedule to quit the Xanax that had been prescribed alongside the Paxil so many years ago (for acute instances of panic), and it was starting to seem like more than coincidence that my body pains and mental confusion increased as my levels of medication decreased.

After a while, I wanted nothing more to do with medications. I just wanted my doctor to define my situation and offer me hope that it would get better. I just wanted to know that I wasn’t dying, really. I wanted expert guidance that would take me through the prescription drug withdrawal process, but unfortunately, Dr. Feelgood didn’t have much to offer in that department.

“You should have quit the Xanax first,” was about all Feelgood had to say when I outlined my situation for him and pressed for withdrawal-specific information. I’m still not sure of the logic behind that statement, but I think he was giving a sly nod to the pain he knew I was yet to endure if I continued to cut my Xanax dosage. I’m almost certain that he had seen my sort of situation before (how could he not have?), but he never came out and said so. Instead, he acted a little confused.

I was starting to feel hopeless. Was I somehow imagining it all? Where besides the Internet could I find information regarding the strange physical and mental symptoms that had been torturing me for months? Where could I turn for help?

Oh, how I wished that I’d never left my first doctor. Some time earlier, when that primary care physician whom I’ll call The Good Doctor had started to get squeamish with my Xanax levels and refused to increase them any further, I’d sought a replacement for him and quickly found a sympathetic goatee in Dr. Feelgood. But now I desperately wished that I’d never switched loyalties.

The Good Doctor was a man who truly cared about his patients. He had a healthy BMI, a clean-shaven face, and a compassionate demeanor. He’d truly seemed to care about me. The Good Doctor had preached about the need to attack anxiety and other illnesses with methods other than pills, and when he didn’t understand something—as was the case when he admitted to being a little green about clinical levels of anxiety—he acknowledged his ignorance and tried to make a wise referral (in my case, a referral to a therapist whom I don’t remember ever calling).

The Good Doctor had been so kind and concerned. He’d talked about total wellbeing and things like exercise and a healthy diet. Appointments with him might last upwards of 40 minutes—well, well past the 15 minutes or 20 minutes that I’m sure the clinic held as sacrosanct “best-practice” parameters—and he was not a man who relished reaching for the prescription pad, which seemed to be a last resort for him.

The Good Doctor was the opposite of Dr. Feelgood in nearly every way—you would never be able to picture him going on the lecture circuit for big pharmaceutical companies or complying with calloused appointment time limits—and after a while, I think he was forced out of the medical establishment because of his unique posture.

One day, after I’d already been seeing Dr. Feelgood for some time, I received a letter from The Good Doctor, a communication he must have sent to all current and former patients. The letter said that he was leaving the medical profession to teach middle school. The Good Doctor said that he was looking forward to helping children learn about the planets.

Because my interactions with Dr. Feelgood had been disappointing—because the medical establishment didn’t seem to recognize prescription drug withdrawal as a condition that might last for months or years—I stayed away from doctors for a while, hoping that my situation would resolve itself so that I wouldn’t feel the need to talk to people in white coats anymore. However, when every new cut to my Xanax dosage brought with it otherworldly pains that left me searching for answers, I relented and made an appointment with Dr. Dipstick, a colleague of Feelgood’s who worked at a clinic across town.

By this time my situation had become more confusing than ever. I was often depressed, perplexed, fatigued, paranoid, and anxious, and new and fantastical body pains arrived on my doorstep regularly like taunting packages that had been sent by GlaxoSmithKline or Pfizer.

When I arrived for my appointment with Dr. Dipstick, I was broken, fragile, and nervous. I was desperately looking for someone to help me, but would he be the one? I tried to remain optimistic. Maybe he would smile and tell me, “The truth is that we see this all the time. We prescribe A LOT of these medications, so we have to help a lot of people get off them, too. Don’t worry, you’re not dying (friendly chuckle), you’re just going through withdrawal. You’re going to be all right, and I’m going to help you until you are fully recovered.”

But Dr. Dipstick didn’t say any of that. Instead, he was at first indifferent and then insulting. He actually made me feel foolish and ashamed for coming to him, and he often seemed confused as to what I wanted out of the visit. I tried to explain to him how I’d been suffering since quitting Paxil and then embarking on a Xanax-reduction schedule, but my words hit a wall. Maybe he was ignorant of prescription drug withdrawal, but if he was, he could have admitted that ignorance and providing a referral to someone else like The Good Doctor would have. Instead, he began to fill the void with blame.

“Do you ever need an eye-opener?” Dipstick asked me accusingly. His full beard made him appear gruff and even menacing.

“I don’t know what that is,” I told him.

“It’s when you need a drink to get going in the morning,” he explained, certain that he wasn’t telling me anything new.

“I don’t understand,” I said.

“Well, you said on your intake form that you drink beer pretty regularly, and just going through your medical history here, I see that you’ve had some elevated ALT and AST liver function numbers in the past.”

I tried to steer the conversation back to the Xanax taper that I was in the midst of—back to the anxiety and pains that increased with each step in that reduction schedule—but he just didn’t seem interested.

“Maybe you could refer me to someone who could guide me through this?” I asked, shaking. “Maybe to someone in your psychiatry department who specializes in anxiety and the medications used to treat anxiety.”

“I don’t know of anyone like that in particular,” Dipstick said flatly. “I can give you the general triage number for psychiatry, and they’ll probably have you speak with a social worker who will assess your needs.”

“How would a social worker help me?” I asked desperately.

“Well, maybe they’d refer you to a substance abuse treatment facility.” Dipstick answered, and my stomach sunk to previously unknown depths of despair.

I was beginning to see a disturbing picture emerge. When I’d been dutifully taking the medications, I’d been a valued patient. The doctors had happily provided with information about “transition periods” and side-effects. But now that I was quitting the medications, I was nothing to them but an addict or neurotic who needed to help himself. They had no medical information for me, and they seemed to have no insight into the many symptoms that were making my life hell.

The visit to Dr. Dipstick was beyond disheartening. I could have gotten more sympathy for my situation by talking to the clerks at the corner gas station, and I could have gotten more information by staying at home and using Google, which would ultimately prove to be an invaluable resource during my ordeal.

The visit to Dipstick was bad, but the paperwork I received from his office several days later was almost worse. Under Reasons for Visit, Dr. Dipstick had written Alcohol Abuse. My mind raced, wondering why he was doing this. Was he a friend of Dr. Feelgood? Was he trying to protect his friend—the one who had seen my Xanax prescription balloon under his watch—from some sort of lawsuit? Whatever the case, the comments he’d added to my official medical record had just further muddied the waters of my situation at the clinic. Those comments would be the first thing that a new doctor would read (if I went to one), so there was now zero chance that I’d get any educated help.

A few days after my visit with Dr. Dipstick, I called his office and spoke with a nurse, relaying to her my concerns about the Reasons for Visit remarks that Dipstick had stamped onto my record. I asked her if she could please have the doctor remove those remarks, and a short while later she got back to me.

“Dr. Dipstick says that he won’t do that,” she said, not unkindly. I was both heartbroken and furious. I wanted to drive to the clinic and confront the doctor in person, but of course, withdrawal had left me too timid and weak for such a heroic effort. Instead, I wrote a letter to the clinic a few months later.

As I wrote my letter, I tried to channel my frustration and righteous anger. I told the clinic about Dr. Dipstick’s dismissive and judgmental demeanor, and I told them about how the increase in my liver enzyme numbers—the increase that Dipstick had attached, along with my withdrawal pains, to beer drinking—appeared to have been just another dangerous effect of the medications I was quitting. Those numbers had returned to normal once I’d quit Paxil and started reducing Xanax dosages, so I felt that such a fact needed to be entered into some official record. I wanted to enter every last bit of my situation into some official record so that future withdrawal cases wouldn’t be dismissed so easily.

But I never sent the letter, just in case I needed an appointment in the future.

As it turned out, I did make another appointment with the clinic, a final visit to Dr. Feelgood that would be my last doctor appointment to date. By that time I’d been off Paxil for nearly 16 months and completely free of Xanax for about four months. New physical and mental pains were still arriving every week, and although I doubted Feelgood had any new insights for me, I wanted him to run some tests to make sure that I wasn’t seriously ill with something other than withdrawal.

“I could prescribe you something for Fibromyalgia pain,” Feelgood suggested almost sheepishly, “but it doesn’t seem like you want to go the medication route anymore.”

I shook my head. “I just want to make sure I’m not dying,” I said.

“Well, we can definitely run some tests,” Feelgood said. “We will definitely try to rule things out.”

 “And I want to start cutting back on my blood pressure medications, too,” I said. “Now that I’m getting healthier, I just don’t think I need them anymore. Certainly not three of them.”

“We can start reducing those and see how it goes,” Feelgood said without much hesitation. He demeanor was friendly, and I even thought I sensed a newfound respect coming from him. I don’t know if he’d ever seen a patient of his successfully quit multiple medications or not, but now that he’d seen me do it, maybe he would have something hopeful to tell future patients who were suffering through similar scenarios. Or maybe I was just imagining increased attention and thoughtfulness on his part. Maybe I just wanted to see something positive in the situation.

Thankfully, my lab results from that last visit to Dr. Feelgood all came back normal. However, the pain of prescription drug withdrawal continued for a good while. Even the blood pressure medications that I was able to give up after getting back to a healthy lifestyle came with a ridiculous amount of withdrawal effects, things that could lead a person to believe that he was losing his mind or dying if he didn’t know better.

Pills do have consequences, even if a trusted doctor is prescribing them and even if health insurance is paying for them. Prescription drug withdrawal is real, even if a relatively small number of people are talking about it. It’s as real as any purported benefits of the medications that are so readily given out nowadays for every ailment under the sun. Think about it: if a designer mix of chemicals is introduced into a person’s system with the intent purpose of altering how the mind and body function, then why wouldn’t there be severe physical and mental repercussions when that mix of chemicals is taken away? I’m now of the opinion that patients should almost always look at prescriptions as a last resort: there are simply too many known instances of modern drugs making people’s physical, emotional, or mental health worse.

Recovery from prescription-drug withdrawal is possible: that’s important for people to know. I’ve now been free of Paxil for almost four years and off of Xanax for a little more than three. I consider myself mostly “cured” of withdrawal (time and healthy self-care habits seem to be the only remedies, by the way), but I still occasionally wonder if I might have some lingering fatigue, confusion, or other symptoms that are the result of taking or quitting the medications (although I realize that such complaints might also just be a common part of approaching 40 in a competitive and stressed-out society). And about the anxiety? I still get flustered and worried at times, but I’ve found that there are ways to fight through such emotions (or avoid them) without making a Faustian deal that involves sacrificing parts of my greater well-being.

I often wonder how different my life might have been if I’d never taken those damned pills in the first place. But such wondering is useless, as useless as the idea that doctors and their pills can keep a person healthy in the first place. True health requires nutritious eating, regular exercise, adequate downtime, meaningful relationships, spiritual enrichment, and professional fulfillment. The Good Doctor would probably tell you that, but unfortunately, he’s not practicing anymore.

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY (ECT) a crime against humanity

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on February 7, 2017
Posted in: Uncategorized. 4 Comments

seniors-ectWhy is it that Bonnie Burstow, Associate Professor at U of T, being attacked for being a trailblazer? For stating the truth by exposing psychiatry as one of the most fraudulent, barbaric practices known to man?

Could it be that her stance on psychiatry rattles the cages of the vested interests who make money out of human suffering?

I believe so. I also believe that there are a lot of irresponsible journalists out there, forwarding the bullshit chemical imbalance theory, the bullshit theory that Electroconvulsive Therapy works and that psychiatry, as a whole, actually has a clue as to how to alleviate human suffering.

Recently I read an article in the Huffington post, submitted by a blogger who took it upon himself to attack Bonnie Burstow for exposing the dangers of ECT. In the article, he refers to the (updated) Canadian Psychiatric Association’s position on ECT CPA – Electroconvulsive Therapy . He couldn’t possibly have read it himself!

This paper is so riddled with inconsistencies, no intelligent person could come to the conclusion that ECT ” should remain readily available as a treatment option”.

Throughout this entire “Scientific Paper” they state (and I quote):

….”Although the mechanism of action is not completely understood…”

….”Although unanswered questions about ECT remain…”

…”it is important to note that the severity of adverse cognitive effects of ECT is dependent upon the specific technique used”.

…”it is therefore difficult to provide specific guidelines for the max allowable number of treatments…”

…”The question of what constitutes the optimal technique for administering ECT is not completely answered.”

… “we still do not know precisely why ECT works.”

…”although awareness of the way treatment technique can effect outcome has increased, it is still not known how to select the ideal form of treatment for a given patient. “

THEY DON’T HAVE A CLUE!

Here’s another line:

…”when used properly, ECT is a safe and effective treatment.”

But didn’t you just tell us that you have no idea of what the ideal form of treatment is?!?!?!

If it is so effective, how come “follow up studies of patients treated for depression especially those with delusional or treatment resistant depression (two common indications for ECT) have high relapse rates in the year after acute treatment.”?

How safe and effective is THAT?

HERES THE KICKER: …“for this reason, some form of maintenance treatment is indicated to prevent relapses”. Which means, shock the shit out of him again – and keep doing it, ca-ching, ca-ching.

Of course it helps doesn’t it, that the poor guy will have no memory of how badly and how often he’s been abused by this treatment? Is this why psychiatrists still get away with giving it? Because ECT has made him passive and apathetic? Because he is now lacking energy and has been stripped of his vitality?

Despite their “scientific” psychobabble, the brutality of ECT just goes to show that psychiatry has not progressed beyond the cruelty and barbarism of its earliest treatments, of which there are many.

Psychiatrists are supposed to help people, not sentence them to a life of despair, memory loss and degradation.

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

ANTI-ANXIETY DRUGS HURT

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on July 9, 2016
Posted in: Uncategorized. 3 Comments

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

BILL 95 – PSYCHIATRY AND YOU

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on August 6, 2015
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: anti-depressants, Bill 95, Canada, e.c.t, human rights, human rights in canada, informed consent, informed consent in canada, lobotomy, mental health, mental health law, mental health law in canada, mental health services, mental health treatments, metal health commission of canada, psychiatrists, Psychiatry, right to privacy. Leave a comment

images-1

There is a Bill being rammed through the legislature right now entitled Bill 95.  It is a Bill that has been drafted for the (purported) purpose to “improve access to mental health services in Ontario”  as apparently, we are in the midst of a “mental health crisis”.  Seems to be flying below the radar.

A Bill goes through 3 readings after which, it becomes law.  Bill 95 has been through 2 readings, which means it has been put forward to the legislature two times and there’s been a debate and it has been moved on to the next phase (a Bill can either move forward or it can be squashed).  This Bill has one more reading and if it goes through – it’s the law…  And nobody knows about it!!!

This is Bill is something right out of Communist Russia.

Let’s just jump right in to what I believe are the most important parts, or those changes that can have the biggest impact in our lives.

This one’s a biggie.

Recommendation #21:   “The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care should create a task force incorporating adequate representation from among others, mental health clients and their caregivers as well as mental health law experts, to investigate and propose changes to Ontario’s mental health legislation and policy pertaining to involuntary admission and treatment.  The changes should ensure that involuntary admission criteria include serious harms that are not merely physical, and that involuntary admission entails treatment.  This task force should report back to the Ministry within one year of the adoption of this report by the legislative assembly.”

What does that even mean “serious harms that are not merely physical”?  And who decides?

At this time, ‘involuntary admission’ currently requires that “you are a harm to yourself or others or, threatening violence”.  They want to change that requirement to a threat of psychological harm.  “Serious harms that are not merely physical.”

For example:

If you are an addict you could be picked up and involuntarily  committed at which point there will no longer be a 72 hour wait or observation – there will be mandatory treatment and that mandatory treatment will be whatever that doctor deems appropriate.   That treatment can include drugs, E.C.T. (electro-convulsive therapy – which your average Joe believes isn’t done anymore) or the newly defined (friendlier) cingulotomy*, which is really just a nicer name for lobotomy.  Yes, it’s become fashionable again.

Oh, it gets better folks.  A throw-away paragraph in Bill 95 is to implement “expeditiously” the recommendations of the 19 people on the 2010 Select Committee On Mental Health and Addictions**. That means “bye bye informed consent!” And here’s  the kicker –  you have no choice on what treatment you will receive. It’s beyond belief.

So how does that differ from the way it works now? When they follow the law (which, putting it mildly isn’t always the way –  and they admit this ) the person has the right to refuse treatment as long as they are not violent or a potential harm to self or others. (IF they are deemed any of the above, a patient can be treated against his will).

The removal of informed consent means that nobody has to be consulted, nobody has to give consent.  You are in deep trouble brother.  The caregivers can automatically treat and “explain later”.

So here we have 19 people in place who we don’t get to choose who will arbitrarily decide the standards of treatment. They don’t even have to tell you what the treatment is going to be or its side effects and you will have no choice but to be drugged into oblivion – or shocked or cut open.

This committee dismisses utterly (but mention it in passing) the gross side effects of psychotropic drugs and the COMPLETE lack of tested efficacy of drug treatment for addiction or mental illness.

It is being proposed to remove autonomy completely. What this means is “the right to choose”.  Your right to choose.  So, a patient (mental or otherwise) will have no rights to decide his own fate. The current rules of the Healthcare Consent Act 1996 state that “all individuals have the right to refuse treatment as long as they pass a two pronged capacity test.”

The Select Committee believes, however, and I quote: “that the right to autonomy must be balanced with the right to be well”.  WTF!?!?!

At least there was SOME outward appearance of scientific protocol.  Now it’s a free for all.   Psychiatrists will have full license, full liberty under the law to drug, shock, operate – anything  goes.  And psychiatrists can come up with (and have done so) some pretty crazy ‘treatments’.

They also recommend changing the Personal Health Information Protection Act,  2004.

Recommendation #22:   The task force created to investigate and propose changes to Ontario’s Mental Health legislation and policy should also investigate and propose changes to the Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004. The changes should ensure that family members and caregivers providing support to, and often living with, an individual with a mental illness or addiction have access to the personal health information necessary to provide that support, to prevent the further deterioration in the health of that individual, and to minimize the risk of serious psychological or physical harm.”

Seems innocuous.  Seems legit right?

Well here’s a scenario.  Nephew Fred has rich Aunt Betty, who’s in her 80’s. Aunt Betty is perfectly sane but is getting older. She is not dramatizing serious harms that are not merely physical.   Or is she?  What does that even mean?  She’s a bit forgetful.  Not so steady on her feet anymore.  Fred gets access to her medical records, sees that Aunt Betty has been getting forgetful, has had a few falls  and notices a couple of other problems stated in her records.  So he contacts the ‘mobile crisis unit’ who come by and do an instant assessment of Aunt Betty,  resulting in her being involuntary committed. Whereupon she is immediately restrained, drugged, and incarcerated in an institution and might well stay there for as long as her medical coverage continues.   And in Ontario, Canada that’s a very long time.  Until the day she dies.

Fred now, armed with evidence that Aunt Betty is suffering from serious harms that are not merely physical can get access to Aunt Betty’s money.  She’s now safely tucked away, against her will for time immemorial.  You see, she has no right to refuse treatment.

The Mental Health Act of 1974 had put an end to this kind of abuse.  You know, where the husband was fed up with a wife and so had her committed.  Much cheaper than a divorce and very easy to do.

On this autonomy issue.  Say you have Power of Attorney over a parent AND your parent is in a nursing home.  Now you would think that you would have the power to prevent harmful treatment or drugging of your parent.  No you don’t.  Not if this parent is deemed a serious harm that is not merely physical. 

This act of the doctor ‘KNOWING BEST’ for the patient (your parent), removes YOUR ability to make those decisions. Because you represent the individual and the individual has no right to refuse treatment. They don’t have to consult you, they don’t have to get your consent.

My point is, this Act will FORCE IN TREATMENT WITH NO PROOF THAT THAT TREATMENT WILL ACTUALLY WORK.  Psychiatrists readily admit that their treatments don’t cure.

I read all the time about the ‘stigma of mental illness’.  What does that mean exactly? Perhaps we could say that it’s a sign of disgrace or discredit, which sets a person apart from others and remains a powerful negative attribute in social relations.

I would argue that the real stigma of mental illness is saying that mental patients haven’t got the right to choose.

Psychiatrists cringe every time they hear the violent crimes that the patients are committing – yet the majority of these patients are all on the ‘treatments’ given to them by the psychiatrists. Talk to any psych survivor.  There are now at least 100 ‘psych survivor’ groups on the internet, trying to warn others about the harm done to them – in the name of ‘help’.  Trying to find a reason or gain recourse for the injustices done to them by psychiatry.  There are hundreds of biographies written by people who have been through the psychiatric system and somehow managed to survive.  Horror stories.

And we’re going to give them this power?

You know what we SHOULD be doing?  Calling for an inquiry into the cover up of deaths from psychiatric treatment. That’s what actually needs to be done.

You must get treatment, you must get treatment. There is no guarantee that their treatment does anything but line the pockets of the whole mental health industry. This is a money grab so cloaked in “we must help these people” that it makes me want to puke.

The elephant in the room is that they are enforcing something on you with absolutely NO EVIDENCE THAT IT WILL RESOLVE THE PROBLEM and in fact may kill you.

Let’s take an example. Oxi-cotin – deadly addiction. Currently a psychiatry recommended and approved treatment – methadone, paid for by our tax dollars. How is a meth addict any better than an oxi addict?  How many revert? The committee keep going back to the Vancouver ‘’treatment’ laws. Have you seen the devastation in the heart of downtown Vancouver?

Like I said. It’s so Communist Russian. You can rat out your neighbor – anybody you like. Accuse them of being an addict, or mentally ill in some way,   The person accused doesn’t even have to be dramatizing ANYTHING and will be immediately treated – thereby guaranteeing they are now mentally ill where they weren’t before. And the mental health industry can ring up the till in thousands of dollars in “treatment’ until you die.  Which probably shouldn’t take too long, considering the treatments, and you have absolutely no right to stop them.

Because Wellness – for which there is no definition, trumps autonomy. And autonomy ladies and gentleman is our God given right. We have the right to be treated as human beings, not as a pawn in the Mental Health shell game.

At the end of the day, who the fuck are these “experts”, who have never cured anything, to decide for you and me?

**CINGULOTOMY – Is a form of psycho-surgery, introduced in 1948 as an alternative to lobotomy.  Today it is used mainly in the treatment of depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

**2010 SELECT COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTIONS –   are the committee that was selected by the Lieutenent Governor (whom I know nothing about at this time, but I sure am interested).

_____________________________________________________

Please write, or better yet go talk to an MPP.  Use every contact you have to  let them know.  Our Human Rights are being taken away from us.

Here is a link to our MPPS ONTARIO.

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Thank You Mr. Terence Young

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on March 4, 2015
Posted in: Uncategorized. 4 Comments

How many children must be killed by dangerous drugs before good people take action?
Perhaps just one – if it’s your child.

Terence Young knows the tragedy of losing someone he loved. His 15 year old daughter Vanessa died far too young. She died after taking a drug called Prepulsid or Ciapride, a drug commonly used  to relieve stomach discomfort or nausea, prescribed by their family doctor.

Then there is Neil Carlin’s daughter Sara, who committed suicide after taking Paxil, a drug which is known to cause suicidal ideation in young people.  Also, Brennan McCartney, 18, killed himself four days after starting Cipralex, an antidepressant.

Perhaps it is fortuitous that Terence Young is a Member of Parliament, from Oakville, a Suburb of Toronto. In such a position, he is able to do more than some other parents who have experienced loss. He sponsored Bill C17, Protecting Canadians from Unsafe Drugs, aimed at tighter controls and more transparency, which was enacted on November 5, 2014. It’s commonly known as Vanessa’s Law, so named in honor of his daughter.

The law requires that healthcare institutions report serious adverse drug reactions to the Minister of Health. This is key to detecting problems with existing and new drugs. Many adverse effects may happen at home and may never be reported, but serious reactions that require medical attention will now be known and tracked. Parents continue to have responsibility to report any reactions that do not involve a hospital or clinic visit.

With enactment of the new law, the Minister of Health is empowered to require more data from drug companies and healthcare providers, require further tests or extensive studies, conduct assessments of a drug’s results, both its effectiveness and its negative reactions. It is important, on an ongoing basis, to determine whether a drug works and assess how dangerous it may be. Previously, the government’s powers to take proactive measures was limited.

In the spirit of transparency, the law allows the Minister of Health to disclose to the appropriate agencies certain business information that would have previously remained hidden. Additionally, information about clinical trials now must be made publicly available. While business confidentially is important in a competitive environment, this confidentiality cannot be prioritized above patients’ rights, health and safety.

And finally, the law empowers the government to protect the public with the ability to require labeling on dangerous drugs, to alter the way drugs and devices are used, and even to order the recall of certain drugs.

The law that Mr. Young sponsored is a  step in the right direction to protect our young people from an industry that has all too often chosen profit over patient safety.

B9qHs0hIUAIuzWsBut there’s more.  Mr. Young just recently announced a new online tool that makes it easier to search drug safety info Drug and Health Product Register.

Any death is heartbreaking. The death of a child, before their life has fully begun, is utterly tragic. To lose a young person in a way that’s completely avoidable, is far beyond tragic.

Though grief is undoubtedly part of his life, Terence Young is doing much more than grieve. He’s doing something effective, working hard with the hope that someday no parent will ever have to face such a tragedy.

The “industry” in question is really two industries, psychiatry/medicine and the pharmaceutical (drug) companies, along with their helpful cohorts in government which provide the funding.
In both cases, and thousands more beyond the scope of one article, these young people – children really, were given drugs with known, serious side effects.  In Vanessa’s case, the side effect of Prepulsid caused cardiac arrhythmias (irregular heart rhythms).  With regard to Sara Carlin and Brennan McCartney, these side effects included mania, psychosis, depression, suicidal thoughts, homicidal thoughts and death.

In the case of (supposed) mental disorders, as in the cases of Sara and Brennan,  there may have been no “illness” at all. Mental disorders are defined and diagnosed only by a list of symptoms. The symptoms describe behaviors and feelings, all subjective, which are supposed to be the result of a diseased brain. Yet there are no objective medical tests that can determine whether a person has such a disorder, a condition for which dangerous drugs may be given.

These disorders cannot be detected by blood analysis, brain scan, or any form of “chemical imbalance” test,  no matter how many fraudulent psychiatrists may claim that symptoms are caused by chemical imbalances.

The symptoms described are real and can be extremely disturbing. Yet, without verifiable testing, the cause of these symptoms is always unknown. This is very, very important because a number of other conditions can manifest identical symptoms – allergies, poor nutrition, extreme stress (does anyone remember high school?), hyper and hypo-thyroid conditions, hormonal issues, a plethora of genuine medical illnesses, even cancer. Before any such dangerous drugs are given, full medical testing should be done to find any underlying conditions.

Why would these “industries” set up such a system that endangers the very patients they have been trusted to help? A simple answer. Money. Psychiatric disorders are listed in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The disorders are voted on by work groups comprised of psychiatrists. According to a 2012 report from the University of Massachusetts, “Three-fourths of the work groups continue to have a majority of their members with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry”.

In the end though, the major responsibility for caring for our children rests with the parents. Each parent must become better informed. Each parent must be aware that diagnosis is subjective and they should seek a second opinion. Each must know that all drugs carry side effects, some of them very dangerous. Parents need to know that they do have a choice, that medical testing can detect the underlying physical cause of any symptoms, that alternative treatments are available, and that, above all, they and their children have rights to choose their own treatment options.

Thank you Mr. Young for taking effective action to protect our youth. Each and every parent can do the same for their own children, and hopefully before anything bad has to happen.

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

MESSAGE TO CANADIAN PSYCHIATRISTS – ANY TAKERS?

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on May 1, 2014
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: anti-psychotic, antidepressants, child psychiatry, mental health, mental health advocates, Psychiatry. 2 Comments

This is really, really, really great news.  Now all we need are some caring, empathic, able to think for themselves,  Canadian psychiatrists to implement this.  Anybody know one?

The ‘Dynamic Duo’ of Leonie Fennel & Maria Bradshaw are at it  again.  Read on.

From Leonie’s Blog

 

CEPUK Launch in Westminster House.

1 May

Peter Gøtzsche

Yesterday myself and Maria Bradshaw attended the launch of ‘The Council for Evidence Based Psychiatry’ in Westminster House. It was an absolute honour to be present at this ground-breaking initiative.

Despite a few hiccups, such as a delayed flight due to the fog in Gatwick, a very irate attendant at the ticket office, London’s tube strike and bloody Ryanair charging us an extra 140 pounds for printing 2 boarding cards; we finally made it to the launch, albeit 2 hours late and more than a little disheveled. Maria, being quite vain, wouldn’t let me take her picture as her hair wasn’t ‘quite right’ (in other words she looked decidedly frazzled). I on the other hand am used to some very dodgy photos, so had no such qualms – although the unsuspecting Peter Gøtzsche does look a little scared! Anyway back to the point:

The CEP’s mission is “To reduce psychiatric harm by communicating the latest evidence to policymakers and practitioners, by sharing the testimony of those who have been harmed, and by supporting research into areas where evidence is lacking”. Members of the CEP include psychiatrists, psychotherapists and academics. Among them are Peter Gøtzsche who co-founded the highly respected Cochrane Collaboration, James Davies, a psychotherapist, author and lecturer, and Dr. Joanna Moncrieff who is also a psychiatrist, author and Senior Lecturer in psychiatry at University College London.

In an earlier interview here, Peter was referring to the fact that prescription drugs are the 3rd leading cause of death in the western world, and said “I don’t know how people can kill so many patients in psychiatry and nobody does anything”. He estimated that Eli Lilly had caused 200,000 deaths with Zyprexa alone.

We got to meet many fabulous people yesterday, Dr Andrew Herxheimer, Dr Bob Johnson, the Earl of Sandwich and his son Luke who organised the event, to name a few. So despite all the hiccups and expense, it was worth every second to be present at the inception of this new project. I have no doubt that the CEP will change the way people view medicine and prevent many, many deaths. It’s also great to see Professor David Healy’s work being backed up by other academics in this field. Now Maria’s job, apart from finding a good hairdresser, is to persuade the CEP to come to Ireland! Find the CEP wesite here and their Twitter account here.

 

 

 

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Zofran – A MOTHER’S STORY

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on February 19, 2014
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: morning sickness, Zofran. 6 Comments

Zofran, Pregnancy Nausea Drug, Won’t Harm Fetus (STUDY)

Article reported by: MARILYNN MARCHIONE – Huffington Post – U.S. Edition:

— There’s reassuring news for pregnant women miserable with morning sickness: A very large study in Denmark finds no evidence that using a popular anti-nausea drug will harm their babies.

Says Dr. Iffath Hoskins, a high-risk pregnancy specialist at NYU Langone Medical Center and a spokeswoman for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists……”It’s effective and it’s safe”.  “Nobody is giving you a gold star for suffering through this.”   CLICK HERE to read the rest of this marketing campaign article.

It’s articles like this one, headlining in news feeds no less than 44 times (at which point I stopped counting) that could lead a mother to believe that Zofran was safe.  That a drug prescribed by a professional, backed up by studies completed by specialists,  recorded in scholarly medical journals, would have no adverse effects on the baby growing inside her.

A young woman recently contacted me asking if I could help her.  She wants to (and is doing so herself) raise awareness regarding the adverse effects her baby suffered due to taking Zofran, prescribed for nausea, while pregnant.  Hmmm…. sounds familiar – Thalidomide.

She said, ” I think you posting on your blog would offer more exposure and maybe even identify more victims in Canada. I began this journey over 13 years ago, initially believing I was the only one!  My, my, my, how wrong I was”.

This unwitting mistake of mothers trusting their caretakers in believing  Zofran was safe is nothing short of an irresponsible and immoral  marketing campaign dreamed up by the pharmaceutical giant  GlaxoSmithKline.  Their purpose?  Money.

Her name is Tomisha LeClair and here is her story:

Tomisha and her daughter Ahjanee.

Tomisha and her daughter Ahjanee.

In 1999, I worked through a temporary agency at Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston processing Blue Cross and Blue Shield insurance claims for the eye laser surgery center. Shortly after my hire there I became aware of my pregnancy with my daughter Ahjanee. Often times at work I became sick and tried desperately to maintain my illness as much as humanly possible. To maximize my chances of keeping my job during my pregnancy I was evaluated at the hospital and soon after I was prescribed a medication for severe nausea and vomiting.

During the same hospital visit I inquired immediately about the drug I had been prescribed and it’s safety and effectiveness. At the time of my first pregnancy with my first born, my son, this medication had not been used. When pregnant with my son in 1991, I also became dangerously ill I lost weight, diagnosed as anemic, and remained sickly throughout the pregnancy until the last trimester when I continued to struggle with morning sickness though my symptoms were never limited to mornings. At the end of the pregnancy with my son I began gaining weight and experienced less hospitalizations, and medical interventions.

Having suffered during my first pregnancy I felt a sense of relief when prescribed what was referred to as “the new wonder-drug”, Zofran and relied on its ability to safely combat the nausea. The nurses explained while administering Zofran to me intravenously.  “All the midwives were taking this medication” because it showed remarkable treatment for severe hyperemesis gravidarium (literally means “excessive vomiting in pregnancy”).

While taking the Zofran pregnant with my daughter I rarely had sickness though I had still not gained a significant amount of weight and so I was told to continue taking medication as prescribed to minimize or eliminate altogether the morning sickness symptoms. As time elapsed I visited with my midwife and continued taking the medication as prescribed to reduce the symptoms. At seven months gestation I was given an ultrasound which doctors at the hospital conveyed to imply my daughter had a renal cyst; a fluid filled sac on one of her kidneys. The medical staff explained there are many children born with this complication and if necessary she could be treated with antibiotics upon birth.

It was at that juncture I was referred to genetic counseling by the same staff to explore the medical backgrounds of myself and my daughter’s father. After attending the genetic counseling session I was no closer to having answers than before I had arrived. The counselor asked many questions and explored the possibility of genetic factors which we would need to identify now, I explained that my daughter’s birth father and I both had other children though not together, still we had not uncovered anything vital and so I was closely monitored with ultrasounds and weekly visits with my midwife who continued to prescribe Zofran to me during my last trimester of pregnancy.

In May, 2000 I gave birth to my daughter Ahjanee who will turn 14 at the end of May. My labor slowly progressed because it was induced due to decreased fluid; revealed earlier that day by ultrasound after I had arrived to the labor and delivery department three weeks prior to my due date.  After giving birth to Ahjanee I knew something was amiss; the medical staff did not convey much information at that time. I waited six hours to see and hold her I was then told she had a genetic syndrome called Smith Lemli Opitz syndrome. The obstetrician’s explained children diagnosed with this syndrome do not live to age 10.

A few days into our stay at the hospital, some Dr.’s approached me for consent to test my daughter’s blood for the syndrome characteristics of smith Lemli Opitz to positively confirm diagnosis. This test as explained to me would indicate whether Ahjanee’s blood revealed an elevated de-cholesterol level common in children with this syndrome. Agreeing to the test several days later I was informed the testing indicated my daughter did not have this genetic syndrome. While visiting with my daughter during her stay at the (NICU) Newborn Intensive Care Unit, and speaking daily with medical staff for updates; a new genetic syndrome had come to the minds of the Dr.’s and so they suggested my daughter Ahjanee may have Schinzel-Gideon syndrome.

Again the medical staff requested permission to perform a test this time a full body bone scan to compare Ahjanee’s bony findings to that of children with this syndrome, again I complied.

After this syndrome was ruled out, my baby was finally discharged after staying eleven days in the NICU. The geneticist’s at Children’s Hospital now proposed my daughter may be suffering from Pallister-Killian disease. This disease, Pallister-Killian caused children to have stunted dwarf-like growth, and poor circulation throughout their bodies. For the third time I agreed and consented to testing this time in the form of a brain-scan to examine my daughter’s brain size, make-up, structure, activity, and brain function. Though none of this testing was painful to Ahjanee it had a deep impact on my daily functioning due to the fact I was certain they would diagnose her with some untreatable disease or syndrome.

After three attempts to find a proper diagnosis for my daughter the genetic specialist’s told me “We are not sure what her condition is at this time, there is a strong likelihood that the problem is genetic and may take years to diagnosis”.

At this point, I began to do some research of my own to find out more about the medication I was prescribed throughout the pregnancy. After all, I had no genetic indicators in my family or the family of my daughter’s father. The fact that both he and I had other children without any genetic abnormalities I felt the Zofran was worth looking into.  Discharged from the hospital after eleven days of the Newborn Intensive Care Unit, Ahjanee was given the diagnoses “multiple congenital anomalies”; meaning one born with many abnormalities.

In the latter part of 2000 I wrote to the (FDA) the Food and Drug Administration to complete a Med-Watch form reporting my daughter’s “abnormalities”. I initiated a (FOIA) a Freedom of Information Act request to the Food and Drug Administration inquiring about the adverse reactions reported by other patients who had also been prescribed this drug, to compare them to Ahjanee’s abnormalities. My suspicions were that the “wonder drug” had cause Ahjanee’s abnormality’s. Several weeks later I received a 20 page alphabetical list of all the reported adverse reactions reported by other patients, compiled into percentiles. Stunned by the findings of the adverse reactions reported list which included “every abnormality” that Ahjanee suffered from and was diagnosed with and numerous others.

One month after receiving the FOIA request I visited with the Midwife who prescribed this drug to me during my pregnancy. As we sat in her office I explained to her what my research indicated, I relayed my suspicions and the FDA report. It was then that my former Midwife confided that she had also taken the same drug during her pregnancy and had recently given birth to a son. I then inquired about the size, health, and birth gestation of her son. I suggested without knowing for certain based on my research and the FDA report her son was most likely born premature, low birth weight, with failure to thrive, and so I asked just that. When the Midwife confirmed my suspicions I pled with her to do some research of her own and in the meantime to stop prescribing the medication especially during pregnancy. The Midwife extended what appeared to be an offer of help to me and my daughter though even today I am still uncertain of just what she had in mind.

During further research I found that Zofran was originally only prescribed to chemotherapy patients suffering from nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy radiation treatments.  I noticed that somehow the drug had been classified as a Class B drug which means it is equal or as safe as Tylenol use during pregnancy. I concluded the drug manufacturer Glaxo Smith Kline had legally protected their own interests by placing a “strong caution in pregnancy” label on Zofran inserts although the same drug manufacturer is aware of the off-label uses for the medication they do nothing to prevent it from being prescribed to the pregnant.

Note:  Not only did GSK protect their interests by placing a “strong caution in pregnancy”  they actively promoted Zofran to pregnant women for morning sickness.  See below (click for Zofran Timeline):

July 2, 2012:  The U.S. Department of Justice issued a press release (pdf) stating that GlaxoSmithKline would pay a $3 billion settlement after pleading guilty to, among other claims:

  • promoting Zofran for off-label uses such as morning sickness treatment (since the FDA only approved the drug for chemotherapy-related and post-operative nausea); and
  • paying doctors to prescribe the drug.

Tomisha  resides in Massachusetts and  actively works to warn other pregnant women of the dangers of Zofran.  She is also working on a bill called “Ahjanee’s Law”.  If and when enacted, this bill will require medical professionals to warn patients about side effects  of any medication prescribed during pregnancy prior to its prescription.  She can be found on facebook at MA’Z (Mother’s Against Zofran Birth Defects).

She  continues collecting signature’s for Ahjanee’s Law.

If you or anyone you know  took Zofran while pregnant (in Canada only)  please contact me.  A journalist has asked if I could find Canadian women who took ondansetron/Zofran to treat morning sickness/hyperemesis gravidarum.  He is researching/analyzing adverse reaction data relating to Health Canada’s transparency and accountability.

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Vanessa’s Law – ‘Protecting Canadians from Unsafe Drugs’ (Bill C-17)

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on December 8, 2013
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment
From Leonie’s Blog:

7 Dec

Terence youngTerence Young is a Canadian MP whose 15 year old daughter, Vanessa, died from a heart attack due to the heartburn medication Cisapride, marketed as Propulsid.

A month after Vanessa’s death the FDA released a statement stating that Propulsid was being pulled off the market due to the associated risk of serious cardiac arrhythmias and death; here. An Article by ‘Thomas L. Perry’ stated that Vanessa’s father was dumbfounded to read this Los Angeles Times exposé showing that the FDA and the manufacturer had known since 1993, 7 years before Vanessa’s death, that Prepulsid caused cardiac arrhythmias.

Yesterday (6th Dec 2013), the Canadian Minister for Health Rona Ambrose announced that the Canadian government is introducing new patient safety legislation, Vanessa’s Law, providing for the protection of its citizens from unsafe drugs.Vanessa Young Minister Ambrose stated “Today, we have introduced Vanessa’s Law, a law that would protect Canadians and help ensure that no drug that is unsafe is left on store shelves.” The proposed new legislation, if enacted, will enable the Canadian Government to sanction the pharmaceutical industry for selling unsafe products, proposing fines of up to $5 million per day and even imprisonment. It further provides that the Government can compel drug companies to do further testing, to revise their labels and recall dangerous drugs.

Terence Young stated “It is difficult to overstate the impact this bill will have for Canadians who take prescription and over the counter drugs. It represents a quantum leap forward in protecting vulnerable patients and reducing serious adverse drug reactions. It is absolutely necessary to reduce deaths and injuries caused by adverse drug reactions, seventy percent of which are preventable, and will serve Canadians extremely well.”

It remains to be seen whether this bill will be enacted. If so, the Canadian Government will be the first to put their citizens before the very powerful multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry. Either way, I foresee strong resistance to this bill, but maybe, just maybe, this is the first major bruise on Pharma’s Achilles’ heel.

In contrast to the latter, the UK Government recently debated the suicide link associated with Roche’s ‘Roaccutane’. Again, two parents had waited 10 years to get this debate to Westminster, this time on the Roaccutane-induced ‘suicide’ of their son following a few short weeks on Roche’s notorious acne drug. Roche pulled this drug off the US market in 2009, but it’s still available in the UK and Ireland. It has been stated that Roaccutane may have caused up to 20,000 deaths. The Westminster talk can be viewed here: approx 16.27 Mins. Caroline Nokes MP looked, to all intents and purposes, like she was sucking a Roaccutane-soaked lemon. I can only hope that the promise to keep talking to these parents was well-intentioned and not just Minister’s puff.

So, the Canadian and UK Government are at least discussing prescription drug induced deaths. The Irish Government are not!

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

SO, YOU WANT A LOBOTOMY?

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on October 19, 2013
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: Adderal, adhd, bipolar, risperdal, ritalin, seroquel, seroxat, zyprexa. 2 Comments

You can DO IT YOURSELF!  Yes, a D.I.Y. Lobotomy.

See, I’m a big proponent of D.I.Y.  Have executed countless D.I.Y. projects myself,  shared many functional  D.I.Y. tips on my Pinterest and Facebook accounts.  I haven’t necessarily tried all of them, but I find that the ones that require no special skill, are not crazy expensive and ALWAYS get the expected result should be shared and this D.I.Y. fits all that criteria and then some.    This is one of your easier D.I.Y.’s.

http-inlinethumb64.webshots.com-43135-2429175020105101600S600x600Q85NO NASTY ICEPICKS!

With a little bit of research (under one hour)  you will find all the information about all the drugs that you require, but a little bit of advice from this self proclaimed D.I.Y. Diva –  I would  stay away from ‘accredited websites’ such as  Health Canada or the FDA – they tend to never get it right. They must suppress or ignore (I really don’t know what the hell they’re doing with) actual reports from real people.  This is a nightmare for D.I.Y.ers.   You need to get the data from people who have actually taken (or are on) these drugs to get the real skinny.   Google “I feel like a Zombie” or something like that.  See what happens.

Depending on how fast you want this to come about, you may want to double or triple up on the drugs you have chosen.  That’s the beauty of D.I.Y.  eh? YOU control this as it’s  totally dependent on your choice of drug(s)  and how long you want to spend getting there.

No hospital stay or even visit, required.  Easier than ever to achieve. No expensive specialists needed – you don’t even have to waste your time and (in the U.S.) money on a psychiatrist!   Your family doctor will help!   Just tell him what you want and he’ll write the prescription(s).   It’s a D.I.Y.’ers duhreeeeaaaam!

No more ice-pick hangover!   No more nasty scars or burn tissue to deal with!  No more niggling fears  that too much tissue will be severed  (thus instantaneously rendering you a complete vegetable)!  Nope, it’s a ‘steady as she goes’ process and best of all, you won’t even realize it’s happening!!!

Good luck to you.  Let me know how it goes.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

EmpathicTherapy_DVDcover“These drugs impair the brain specifically by blocking the transmission to the frontal lobes of the brain…..When you give one of these drugs (Risperdal, Seroquel, Zyprexa etc.) you reduce the personhood with these drugs, even more profoundly than with the stimulant drugs (Ritalin, Adderall, Dexedrine etc.)”.

“You disable their brains.  It’s a chemical lobotomy and that’s NOT a metaphor – that’s a fact”.

Dr. Peter Breggin

A documentary by Kevin P. Miller.  Crucial data for parents.

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Risperdal – A Canadian Story

Posted by lorifarquharbryenton on September 29, 2013
Posted in: Uncategorized. Tagged: class action lawsuit. 41 Comments

Canada doesn’t appear to be as litigious as the U.S. and you don’t hear much about successful cases brought up against the Pharma giants here but I’m really hoping that this is going to change in Canada….and fast.

And it’s not that I want to see litigants become suddenly wealthy either.  It’s because I want the Pharmaceutical companies to stop marketing and selling drugs that are maiming and killing people – our children in particular.

It’s been my experience that the ONLY way stop a Pharmaceutical company from doing this is to hit them where it hurts, where it costs them some money because, you see, ethics have long gone.  Responsibility is non-existent and it is unfortunately the only thing that will do it.

It’s not enough for them to pull drugs off the market on account of these drugs have killed or caused kids to kill.   Kids like Toran Henry from New Zealand (suicided while on Prozac) or Shane Clancey from Ireland (stabbed a boy then turned the knife on himself while on Celexa) or Brennan McCartney from Canada (suicided while on Cipralex) and thousands more.

So there’s hope here.  Hope in the form of a Mr. Joseph M. Prodor, a lawyer in British Columbia who is working on a class action lawsuit* against Johnson & Johnson, makers of Risperdal.

Risperdal is an anti-psychotic and has been prescribed (off label) to boys who subsequently grew breasts due to one of the drugs side effects – elevated levels of female hormones (prolactin) .   Some of these kids have to have their breasts surgically removed.

Risperdal has  been approved for  children for the following:

Schizophrenia- Treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents aged 13-17

Bipolar Disorder- Short term-treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with Bipolar I Disorder in children and adolescents aged 10-17

Autistic Disorder- Treatment of irritability associated with autistic disorder in children and adolescents aged 5-16

Here is a clip regarding a lawsuit in the U.S.  Notice how J & J caved (and settled) the lawsuit as soon as their CEO, Alex Gorsky was next to get on the stand.  Wonder why?

Mr. Joseph M. Prodor a Lawyer in British Columbia, Canada, is currently collecting information from Canadians who have been affected by this medication and is going to be taking it to the courts to get it certified as a class action lawsuit.

OFF-LABEL PRESCRIBING
While Risperdal has only been approved for the above uses in children, doctors are able to prescribe it for various other unapproved or “off-label uses” such as:ADHD
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)
Anxiety disorders
Eating disorders
Tourette syndrome
Disruptive behavior disorders in children
Depression
While it may be legal, the practice of off-label prescribing puts children at risk for serious, life-threatening side-effects without concrete proof/evidence of benefit.

RISPERDAL SIDE-EFFECTS
Rapid weight gain
Hypertension
Diabetes
Breast cancer
Tumors of the pituitary gland
Gynecomastia (breast development in males)
Galactorrhea (lactation)
Hyperprolactinemia
Decreased bone mineral density
Osteoporosis
Metabolic syndrome
Involuntary movement disorders (tics, twitches, muscle contractions)
Nueroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS)

For anyone in Canada wishing to join this lawsuit, please contact:

Joseph M. Prodor, Esq. (trial lawyer)
15260 Thrift Avenue
White Rock, BC V4B 2L2

Tel: 604-536-4676
Fax: 604-535-8981
Toll Free Tel: 1-877-JPRODOR (1-877-577-6367)
jprodor@axionet.com

He will be able to take your info and direct you to someone in your province or give you instructions.

*A class action lawsuit is filed on behalf of a group of people who have been in some way injured by the actions of a company.

When someone joins a class action lawsuit, he usually has to sign papers declaring that he then forfeits the right to sue the company as an individual. A successful suit awards damages to the plaintiffs, who are those suing the company, according to greatest damage. In most cases, not all members of the suit are entitled to equal compensation.

Usually, the attorneys work on a contingency basis, which means that they will receive a portion of the award but charge their clients no fees if the suit is not successful. That portion can be high, ranging from 30% to 50% of the total award.

Share

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
  • Traffic

    • 23,672 hits
  • Anti-depressant Side Effects
  • DOCUMENTARIES

    • Just a Coincidence? Death by anti-depressants
    • MAKING A KILLING
    • The Drugging of Our Children
  • FREEDOM FIGHTERS

    • CASPER
    • CCHR INTERNATIONAL
    • GSK: LICENCE TO (K) ILL
    • LEONIE FENNELL'S BLOG
    • PROZAC WITHDRAWAL BLOGSPOT
    • SEROXAT SUFFERERS – STAND UP AND BE COUNTED
    • SPEED UP SIT STILL
  • INFORMATION & RESOURCES

    • 1 Boring Old Man
    • CCHR International
    • GSK: LICENCE TO (K) ILL
    • Mad in America
    • Pharmalot/Pharma Blog
    • PharmaWatch Canada
    • Toxic Psychiatry
  • VIDEOS

    • Just a Coincidence? Death by anti-depressants
    • Sara Carlin – Death by Paxil
    • WE ALL FALL DOWN
  • ZANY

    • DOCTOR BONKERS PRESENTS…
    • PSYCH-TIMES.COM
  • Recent Posts

    • THE HISTORY OF ECT
    • THE DEAD DON’T LIE
    • PSYCHIATRY: INDUSTRY OF DEATH EXHIBIT – COMING TO TORONTO
    • PSYCHIATRY & ONE BRAVE MAN
    • ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY (ECT) a crime against humanity
  • Archives

    • April 2018
    • December 2017
    • September 2017
    • June 2017
    • February 2017
    • July 2016
    • August 2015
    • March 2015
    • May 2014
    • February 2014
    • December 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • February 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,068 other subscribers
  • Psychiatry

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
  • stats for wordpress
Blog at WordPress.com.
Dead Man's Vitamin
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Dead Man's Vitamin
    • Join 48 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Dead Man's Vitamin
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: